Reina - Tournament
| Legality (show more) |
|---|
| Standard Ban List 23.09 (latest) |
| Standard Ban List 23.08 (active) |
| Rotation |
|---|
| Pre-rotation decklist |
| Packs |
|---|
| Core Set |
| What Lies Ahead |
| A Study in Static |
| Humanity's Shadow |
| Creation and Control |
| Mala Tempora |
| True Colors |
| Card draw simulator |
|---|
|
Odds: 0% – 0% – 0% more
|
| Repartition by Cost |
|---|
| Repartition by Strength |
|---|
| Derived from |
|---|
| None. Self-made deck here. |
| Inspiration for | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Whizzard - Tournament | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Include in your page (help) |
|---|
chiefyk 56
| 3 comments |
|---|
|
25 Feb 2014
bot2563
|
|
25 Feb 2014
x3r0h0ur
it looks like he wants boostable breakers. This appears to be a "back to basics" type build. Given the free credits from spinal and cyberfeeder, and with cyberfeeder, the whole build might actually run fairly cheap. I do find the lack of medium/nerve agent disturbing. |
|
25 Feb 2014
chiefyk
Yeah I'm working around a "back to basics" style deck. I've had some good success with it so far. It just needs a lot more play testing. Force of Nature isn't actually that bad when you have Spinal Modem or a couple of Cyberfeeders in play, it can run very cheaply. The main issue was Ninja costing 4 or 5 to break tiny Sentries, which is why I have Mimic as my backup "money-saving" breaker. I've recently switched to a slightly different version of this deck running Whizzard, it can get going pretty quickly, and the economy is strong. Like I said though, more play testing is required. |
Why playing Force of Nature?