I'm a BIG GIRl now!

Oathwood 241

This deck is all about heavy Ice Breakers. See past the install cost and focus on the numbers. All these breakers cost almost nothing to use compared to other breakers, and will get you in almost everywhere with about 10 credits on you.

The key feature in this deck is Test Run. Your goal is to get that card as fast as possible, and to your aid you got Professional Contacts and Diesel. When you have it, use it together with Scavenge to lower the install cost of our 7-9 credit breakers. You will land on about 3-5 credits per breaker, and have the freedom to choose wich one. Same Old Thing makes the Test Run combos even easier to score.

At a first, the ecenomy can look a little on the low side, but once you have your Magnum Opus and Prof.Con up, you will never have to care about the money.

3 comments
20 Mar 2014 x3r0h0ur

The only issue I could see is if you have to fit Ram and Opus out before toolboxing, you wouldn't be able to fit garrote. I can see that you could install femme though, but then you won't fit torch. I'd think 3x memchip would help, but I'm not sure where you'd slot it, maybe over the 2 lawyer ups and swap Ram for corroder (they're equally efficient and corroder is cheaper). I do love ram though...

20 Mar 2014 Maugman

I ran this type deck a couple of times, and the truth is it is extremely chancy due to the lack of programs. You need all three main breakers up fairly quick, and you only have 3 test runs and one copy of each. Two games in a row I got through half my deck with two test runs.., and even then you're supposed to wait for the scavenge. Also, I think you've got a little too much multi access on R&D...You could stand to drop 2-3 of some combination of indexing, maker's and RDI, make room for more econ or SMC or something. And not to pile on but all your econ is click intensive. Theoretically the point of having efficient breakers is to make a lot of runs, but you're not going to have time between shaking siphon tags with doubles and clicking MO. Seems like you could maybe double down on even more R&D cards and focus on just a few runs with cheaper, inefficient breakers.

20 Mar 2014 Oathwood

Thank you for the feedback! I will try the deck out some games, and see if I need to change anything. If so, I will definitely take your advice into consideration :)