paintbrush dependent

I'll give more detailed feedback later, but maybe consider using test run or self modifying code if you are dependant on finding one card to make this deck work. Also maybe a third account siphon and a lawyer up to remove those siphon tags and get more card draw. I'm not convinced that lucky find is the best use of that influence, and a third sure gamble might be a better way to go instead. Also, for memory, a dyson chip or two might be less taxing as far as influence goes than your cybersolution if you think you need more memory. A second desperado might be the best way to go in this regard though. I think that having only one HQ interface might be too little to matter, stacking two or three in much more damaging, especially if you combine it with a sneakdoor beta. Daily casts instead of armitage codebusting might be a better option to save clicks, but a back job combined with account siphon (up to 18 credits in 1 run - I'll have the check the rules for this). I think that you have a solid start, but too many one-ofs in the deck to make it very reliable.