“Knickknack” O’Brian is the “new Aesop’s Pawnshop”.
For example, Knickknack gets Gain 2[$]. Draw 1 card.
for sacrificing an empty Coalescence, while Aesop got Gain 3[$].
. However:
- Knickknack “reimburses” you: if you buy for
$1
, you sell for$1
, as well as the1 card
itself (like Geist). - Aesop just “swindled” for you: if you buy for
$1
, you still sell for the full$3
, having had a much higher floor than Knickknack. - Its
The first time each turn a run begins, …
is a (slightly) more interactiveWhenever your turn begins, …
; and can even be (slightly) more frequent, since you can run immediately after installing the resource. - Both enable
if you trashed your …
gates (of Simulchip or Boi-tatá).
Synergies:
Multi-Cards: While Netrunner lacks “card tokens”, one Muse–Coalescence provides two,
$2
-cost sacrificeables (from a single click/card, over the next two turns).Cost-Redux: If more self-cost reductions get printed (like Carmen, which costs
$3
to install but reads with a printed install cost of$5
) in Shaper, then Knickknack can actually profit off the sacrifice (like Aesop did). As well as cost reductions in general (like DZMZ Optimizer and Simulchip).“Spendables”: With
virus counters
, like Pelangi (or Cordyceps?). And a few withpower counters
, IE. those withoutWhen this _ is empty, trash it.
, like Coalescence (or the new Devadatta Drone?); as well as the disposable breakers like Revolver (wasting only one “bullet”, to gain two credits and a card), or even Propeller.“Front-loaded’s” cards: With high-value When-Installed triggers (like 5inf The Class Act?).
Compression: If you can compress installs (like the new Illumination, which also cheapens those installs), then Knickknack’s econ can “fully-reimburse” the sacrificed installations (credit, card, and click). Likewise within an Ari or Magdalene deck.
Thus Pawnshop, with its the higher floor and its non-interactivity, seems more powerful, but the design of O’Brian feels more exciting (IMO): you have to care about printed install costs
, you get a “card flow” (like Geist), you have to make a run, and so on.
PS. My hope is a Shaper card with large self-cost-reductions, like:
- a gated
[$5]; This resource costs 3[$] less to install if you've trashed one of your cards this turn.
, which works with the Pawnshop archetype (and Simulchip in any archetype). - or even a scaling
[$6]; This program costs 1[$] less to install for each power counter among active Runner cards.
, which is unbounded.
NB. While it can sac a 4[$]
Principia that only cost you 2[$]
to install (for Gain 4[$]. Draw 1 card.
), you don't want to be sac'ing Fracters. Like how Aesop sac'd a just-used/off-matchup Paricia (for Gain 3[$].
).