Biawak (🦎) is the “new Archer”!
The facecheck is similar (though not identical): 4[$]
, 6 strength
→ Trash 1 installed program. Trash 1 installed resource. End the run.
. Thus, the Corp can still destroy two installations, even including two “icemelters” in general (like Bankhar and a Botulus), but not two icebreakers
in particular (like the Fracter and Decoder that were breaking ↳ End the run.
’s elsewhere).
Its rez-cost is either 4[$], forfeit 1 agenda
(like Archer (with a Data Dealer-ish exchange-rate), or 14[$]
(post–Government Subsidy?). As with Valentão, you (almost always) want to forfeit the agenda or take the badpub; but you can (sometimes) just pay the extra credits or remove the tag. I like including “secondary” costs alongside “primary” alt-costs.
Its first two subroutines (↳ Trash 1 installed _ or end the run.
) are choices (like Ballista), but encountering Biawak can both EtR and trash programs/resources (like Tithonium). Thus, even if the Runner had no (relevant) non-hardware installed, the Corp can still tax with three “must-break” EtR-subs: un-Boomerang-able/un-Botulus-able (if they want to “just pass through”).
Flavor-wise, the art is a Komodo dragon (the largest lizard), and "biawak" means "monitor lizard" in Malay/Indonesian.
I think it might be time to politely go ask your mommy for some chicken tendies, you seem a bit hangry. It's ok hun, bad takes can happen before actually playing a card.
— Zeebag
Like ppl ever facecheck anything in this game anymore. Nobody runs without either full rig or some stupid broken PRO RUNNER cards. So sure even a Rototurret facechecked can hurt you. But if we all still pretend that the magical fantasy land called Netrunner still exists in this game then your absolutely right. But we arent living in this wonderful place anymore brother David. So pls stop comments like this like this ICE is good or dangerous when in the real world at the table your situation never happens.
— Force9